gno.law

People v. Suhr

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 254. · 1914-09-10 · Published · 143 P. 1088 · 25 Cal. App. 805 · 1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 270

The People v. H. D. Suhr

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Yuba County
Trial judge
Eugene P. McDaniel
Outcome
affirmed — order are affirmed.
Area
criminal
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

It was stipulated that Crim. No. 253, People v. Ford, and Crim. No. 254, People v. Suhr, should be tried together and that the appeals in both cases should be heard on the record brought up in Crim. No. 253, People v. Ford. The law and the facts in both cases have been fully considered in People v.Ford, ante, p. 388, [143 P. 1075], this day decided.

Upon the authority of that case and for the reasons therein given, The judgment and order are affirmed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on November 9, 1914. *Page 806

Cites, in this corpus