People v. Warner
The People v. Harry Warner
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Emmet H. Wilson
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM CASES. THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction on a charge of burglary. [1] The sole ground of appeal relied upon by appellant is identical with the contention of appellant inPeople v. Giron (Crim. No. 1699), ante, p. 53 [270 P. 462]. On the authority of that decision, and for the reasons therein appearing, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on October 15, 1928. *Page 799
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Giron Docket No. 1699. · 1928-09-19