gno.law

In Matter of Harkins

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 1644. · 1931-09-19 · Published · 3 P.2d 324 · 116 Cal. App. 769 · 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 410

In the Matter of the Application of William H. Harkins for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Area
other

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASE. THE COURT.

[1] It is the claim of the petitioner that the evidence is insufficient to support the order. The petitioner has presented no transcript of the testimony. The writ is denied under the authority of In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal.App. 368 [205 P. 72], and Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal.App. 21 [297 P. 566]. *Page 770 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]

*Page 1

Cites, in this corpus