In Re Bernson
In the Matter of the Application of B. Bernson for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
- Area
- other
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
It appears to the court that the imprisonment of the petitioner from which he seeks to be discharged was voluntarily submitted to by him for the purpose of presenting in this proceeding the question as to the validity of the order holding him to answer to the superior court for trial, and for that reason the remedy by habeas corpus should not be available to him.
Upon the authority of In re Gow, 139 Cal. 242, [73 P. 1451,Ex parte Schmitz, 150 Cal. 663, [89 P. 438], and Ex parteFord, 160 Cal. 334, [Ann. Cas. 1912D, 1267, 35 *Page 345 L. R. A. (N. S.) 882, 116 P. 757], it is ordered that the proceeding be and it is hereby dismissed, and petitioner is remanded to the custody of the sheriff.
Cites, in this corpus
- Matter of Ford Crim. No. 1611. · 1911-07-03
- Ex Parte Schmitz Crim. No. 1380. · 1907-03-14
- In Re Gow Crim. No. 1039. · 1903-06-06
Cited by
- In Re Bocci Docket No. 1402. · 1927-06-30
- In Re Ortiz Docket No. 1162. · 1925-02-05