Wagg v. Hatch
W.I. Wagg v. John Hatch
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- J. B. Landis
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM CASE. THE COURT.
[1] This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants. The parties have filed herein the following stipulation:
"It is hereby stipulated . . . that the above-entitled case involves the same facts and circumstances as the case of Wagg v. Toler et al., 80 Cal.App. 501 [251 P. 973], and it is hereby stipulated that the above-entitled case may be submitted without oral argument for decision by the court, upon the authority of the opinion in Wagg v. Toler, supra, rendered December 28, 1926."
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, and on the authority ofWagg v. Toler, 80 Cal.App. 501 [251 P. 973], the judgment is affirmed. *Page 1
Cites, in this corpus
- Wagg v. Toler Docket No. 3179. · 1926-12-28