gno.law

Craig v. San Fernando Furniture Co.

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 5612. · 1928-02-09 · Published · 264 P. 788 · 89 Cal. App. 794 · 1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 217

Charles E. Craig v. San Fernando Furniture Co.

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Trial judge
Ruben S. Schmidt
Outcome
reversed in part — Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Area
civil
Panel
Hahn (author), <italic>pro tem.</italic>

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

[1] In conformity with the stipulation entered into by counsel for the respective parties in the above-entitled cause, and in accordance with the opinion in the case of Mary J. Craig,Plaintiff and Appellant, v. San Fernando Furniture Co. et al.,Defendants and Respondents, being Civil No. 5644, ante, p. 167 [264 P. 784].

It is hereby ordered that the judgment of dismissal as against defendant San Fernando Furniture Company be and it is reversed and set aside, and that the judgment of dismissal of the action as against defendants Alex Cohen, Louis Cohen, and Morris Cohen be and it is affirmed.

It is further ordered that the appeals from the order of court sustaining defendants' demurrers and from the order of court granting the motions of the defendants to strike from the amended complaint be dismissed.

Conrey, P.J., and York, J., concurred. *Page 795

Cites, in this corpus