Clayton v. Superior Court
Phineas D. Clayton v. the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Outcome
- writ denied — APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition to restrain the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and James G. Conlan, Judge thereof, from dissolving an attachment. Writ denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The petition for an alternative writ of prohibition is denied.
[1] The respondent court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the motion to dissolve petitioner's attachment (TruckOwners Shippers, Inc., v. Superior Court, 194 Cal. 146 [228 P. 19]), and this power did not depend upon the correctness of the decision (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1102; Dahlgren v. SuperiorCourt, 8 Cal.App. 622 [97 P. 681]; People v. San Diego,71 Cal.App. 421 [236 P. 377]). *Page 620
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. City of San Diego Docket No. 4789. · 1925-02-25
- Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc. v. Superior Court S. F. No. 11090. · 1924-07-18
- Dahlgren v. Superior Court Civ. No. 508. · 1908-08-13