In Matter of Clark
In the Matter of the Application of Sam Clark for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
- Proceeding
- original
- Outcome
- other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- other
- Panel
- Jess E. Stephens (author), <italic>pro tem.</italic>
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM CASES. [1] The facts of this case are in all essential elements the same as in the case of Application of Claude Williams, (Crim. No. 2264) ante, p. 424 [16 P.2d 172], this day decided by this court. For the reasons stated in the case referred to the writ herein is discharged.
Works, P.J., and Thompson (Ira F.), J., concurred.
*Page 780
Cites, in this corpus
- In Re Williams Docket No. 2264. · 1932-11-10