gno.law

Winkler v. Sierra Park Co.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 2134. · 1918-02-02 · Published · 171 P. 805 · 36 Cal. App. 119

Max Louis Winkler v. Sierra Park Company (A Corporation)

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Trial judge
Curtis D. Wilbur
Outcome
affirmed — order are affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The appeal in this case purports to have been taken from the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiffs and from an order denying the motion of defendants for a new trial. The transcript of the record was filed in this court on July 3, 1916. Thereafter the appeal, on motion duly made, was dismissed as to the Janss Company. No brief has been filed on behalf of appellants and no appearance was made by the appealing parties at the time set for *Page 120 oral argument. We are of the opinion that the appeal taken herein is frivolous and without merit.

The judgment and order are affirmed. In addition to the costs incurred by them, the respondents shall have and recover from appellants the sum of $75 as damages.