gno.law

Beecham v. Burns

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 2388. · 1917-10-04 · Published · 168 P. 419 · 34 Cal. App. 804 · 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 177

William E. Beecham v. C. Y. Burns, City Clerk

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Trial judge
Curtis D. Wilbur
Outcome
other — The facts are similar to those stated in Beecham v. Burns, ante, p. 754, [ 168 P.
Area
civil
Panel
The Court. &#8212 (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

This is said to be an action to compel appellant, as city clerk of the city of Venice, to certify to the sufficiency of a certain recall petition for the recall of one Carlos L. Smart, a trustee of that city. In all respects necessary to be considered for the purposes of a decision, this case is like No. 2387, Beecham v. Burns, ante, p. 754, [168 P. 1058], in which our decision is this day filed. Upon the authority of that decision, the judgment in this action is affirmed.

Cites, in this corpus