Anaheim C.O. Assn. v. Indus. Acc. Com.
Anaheim Co-Operative Orange Association v. Industrial Accident Commission and Stephen A. Rimpau
- Proceeding
- writ
- Outcome
- writ denied — Petition denied.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
[1] The question presented by this petition for a writ ofcertiorari against the Industrial Accident Commission is the same as that which was presented to the supreme court in ImperialIce Development Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., L.A. No. 8334. There the court (by a minute order) denied the petition. Upon the authority of that case the petition for the writ in the instant case is denied.
An application of petitioner to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 5, 1925. *Page 170
Cited by
- Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission Docket No. S.F. 14028. · 1930-12-24
- General Acc. Etc. Corp. v. Ind. Acc. Com. Docket No. 5208. · 1926-04-01
- General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission Civ. No. 5208 · 1926-04-01