gno.law

Beemer v. Roher

California Court of Appeal · Docket No. 8988. · 1934-03-10 · Published · 30 P.2d 549 · 137 Cal. App. 298 · 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 831

Grace A. Beemer, as Administratrix, Etc. v. Henry Clay Roher

Outcome
dismissed — MOTION to vacate and set aside a Writ of Supersedeas. Motion dismissed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Area
civil
Panel
Benjamin K. Knight (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

[1] Pending the hearing of the appeal in the above-entitled cause, one of the appellants, Pacific States Savings and Loan Company, applied to this court for and *Page 299 was granted a writ of supersedeas to stay the execution of that part of the judgment directing said company to pay "forthwith" a sum of money in its possession, which the trial court by its judgment decreed was the property of one of the respondents. Subsequently the respondents moved to vacate and set aside said writ. The appeal has now been determined on the merits (Beemer v. Roher, ante, p. 293 [30 P.2d 547]), the judgment being reversed with directions to revise and re-enter the same in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion filed therein. The entry of the revised judgment will supersede the one appealed from, and therefore the questions raised by respondents' motion to vacate and set aside said writ of supersedeas have become moot. Upon that ground respondents' motion is dismissed.

Tyler, P.J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by