Gonzales v. Los Serranos Company
HENRY GONZALES, Appellant, v. LOS SERRANOS COMPANY Et Al., Respondents
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of San Bernardino County
- Trial judge
- Benjamin F. Warmer
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Charles R. Barnard (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Barnard
BARNARD, P. J.
Except for the name of the plaintiff and claimant, a difference in certain dates and amounts, the essential facts of this case are almost identical with those in the case of Shafer v. Los Serranos Co. & United States National Bank of Los Angeles, (Civil No. 192)
ante, p. 357 [17 Pac. (2d) 1036], this day decided. One difference is that in this case the notice of claim of lien states that the contractors, Hartley & Camp Construction Company, engaged with the United States National Bank of Los Angeles to erect a building on the property described. However, the complaint alleges that the plaintiff furnished the materials, for the value of which a lien is claimed, to the Los Serranos Company, nothing being alleged in the complaint to in any manner indicate any connection of the Los Serranos Company with the property or the owner thereof. In all other respects the facts and findings in the two cases are essentially the same.
Upon the authority of Shafer v. Los Serranos Co. & United States National Bank of Los Angeles, and for the reasons therein set forth, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.
Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Shafer v. Los Serranos Co. Docket No. 192. · 1932-12-23