gno.law

Crocker Wheeler Co. v. American Bonding Co.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 3035. · 1919-12-19 · Published · 187 P. 928 · 45 Cal. App. 793 · 1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 333

Crocker Wheeler Company (A Corporation) v. American Bonding Company of Baltimore (A Corporation)

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Trial judge
Wellborn
Outcome
affirmed — Affirmed.
Area
civil
Panel
Frank G. Finlayson (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

[1] Plaintiff, a materialman who had sold to a building contractor material used in the construction of a building, brought this action upon a bond that had been given by the contractor, and executed by defendant, to secure the payment of labor and material claims. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The bond is the same bond that was before the supreme court in General Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co. of Baltimore,180 Cal. 765, [182 P. 444]. Appellant makes the same points here that were unsuccessfully urged by it there. In every particular, this case is ruled by the decision in that case. For this reason the judgment must be and is affirmed.

Sloane, J., and Thomas, J., concurred. *Page 794

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by