gno.law

Gravelly Ford Canal Co. v. Pope Talbot Land Co.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 1800. · 1918-04-09 · Published · 178 P. 164 · 36 Cal. App. 817 · 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 529

Gravelly Ford Canal Company (A Corporation) v. Pope Talbot Land Company (A Corporation)

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Madera County
Trial judge
M. Conley
Outcome
reversed — the judgment is reversed.
Area
civil
Panel
Chipman (author), &#8212

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

This is an action in which a temporary injunction was granted in the same case as No. 1801, in which latter a permanent injunction was granted. Apparently the matter was heard upon the same record in both cases, except certain maps are found in No. 1800 not attached to the record in No. 1801.

We have considered the questions involved in dealing with the permanent injunction in No. 1801, which would seem to make it unnecessary to consider at any length the questions involved in No. 1800, for they are practically the same in both cases.

On the authority of the case No. 1801, the judgment is reversed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court June 6, 1918.