Bekins v. Smith
R. M. Bekins v. Ella Smith, Etc.
- Proceeding
- appeal from an order
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Fred H. Taft
- Outcome
- dismissed — The appeal is dismissed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court. — (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
In this action plaintiff had judgment in the court below and defendant Ella Smith appealed. An undertaking was given to stay execution and a stay followed. Plaintiff moved to strike out the undertaking and vacate the stay. That motion was denied and this appeal was then taken. The appeal in the main case has been determined by this court and the judgment of the lower court reversed. (Bekins v. Smith et al.,ante, p. 222, [174 P. 96].) The judgment made on determining that appeal has become final. It would serve no purpose affecting the rights of the parties litigant to now take up the questions discussed as to the validity of the stay bond given in the case. Such questions have become of mere abstract interest. (Adams v. Prather et al., 176 Cal. 164, (167 P. 867].)
The appeal is dismissed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Bekins v. Smith Civ. No. 2514. · 1918-05-13
- Adams v. Prather S. F. No. 8054. · 1917-09-18
Cited by
- City of Lodi v. Randtron C037445, C038921 · 2004-05-05