United States F. G. Co. v. Superior Court
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (A Corporation) v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Proceeding
- writ
- Outcome
- writ denied — APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition to restrain the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and James G. Conlan, Judge thereof, from proceeding further with the trial of an action. Writ denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Petition for writ of prohibition.
[1] Petitioner here seeks to restrain the Superior Court from proceeding further with the trial of the action entitled DuttonDredge Company, a Corporation, v. United States Fidelity andGuaranty Company, a corporation, wherein it is sought to recover the sum of $2,812.05 for failure on the part of petitioner to keep the employees of said dredge company insured against liability under the Compensation Act. It is here claimed that the question of the liability of petitioner as an insurance carrier was an issue before the commission and its determination upon the question res judicata. The question whether the decision of the Industrial *Page 437 Accident Commission is res judicata is a matter to be pleaded by petitioner in the trial court and to be there determined.
Petition is denied.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on May 15, 1931.
Cited by
- Reidy v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty. Docket No. L.A. 14403. · 1934-02-16