In Re Cinnamond
In the Matter of the Application of John S. Cinnamond for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
- Proceeding
- writ
- Outcome
- other — 566].) *Page 57
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus. [1] Application denied for the reason that the petitioner had failed to attach to his petition any of the record upon which the trial court acted. It will be presumed, in the absence of any showing to the contrary, that the court acted within its jurisdiction with due regard to the parties. (Goodrich v.Superior Court, 92 Cal.App. 695 [268 P. 669]; Brune v.Superior Court, 113 Cal.App. 21 [297 P. 566].) *Page 57
Cites, in this corpus
- Brune v. Superior Court Docket No. 7851. · 1931-03-25
- Goodrich v. Superior Court Docket No. 6442. · 1928-06-22
Cited by
- In Re Oxman Crim. 2207 · 1950-10-25