United States v. Rebecca Brenes
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED JUN 13 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-50302 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:13-cr-03166-JLS-1 Southern District of California, v. San Diego REBECCA IRENE BRENES, ORDER Defendant - Appellant.
Before: CLIFTON, CALLAHAN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The memorandum disposition filed March 31, 2016, is amended as follows:
On page 4, 9th line from the bottom, replace the sentence:
Under that standard, Brenes cannot show that the district court’s error had “a substantial impact on the jury’s deliberation.”
with:
Under that standard the district court’s error did not have a “substantial impact on the jury’s deliberation.”
With the foregoing amendment to the memorandum disposition, Defendant- Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
No further petitions for rehearing will be accepted in this case.