gno.law

People v. Ramirez CA2/1

California Court of Appeal · B265389 · 2016-04-20 · Unpublished

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of Los Angeles County · No. BA418004
Trial judge
Clifford Klein
Outcome
affirmed — Affirmed.
Area
criminal
Panel
Elwood G. Lui (author), Johnson, Frances Rothschild

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Filed 4/20/16 P. v. Ramirez CA2/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE, B265389

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA418004) v.

MARIA RAMIREZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Clifford Klein, Judge. Affirmed. Stephanie L. Gunther, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. _________________________________ A jury convicted Maria Ramirez of attempted robbery, based upon a November 1, 2013 incident in which she attempted to steal Liliana Lopez’s purse, struggled with Lopez over the purse, head-butted Lopez twice, said she had a gun, and threatened to kill Lopez. The trial court sentenced defendant to 6 years 4 months in prison, which included a 5-year prior serious felony enhancement. Defendant filed a timely appeal. We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and asking this court to independently review the record. On January 20, 2016, we advised defendant she had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues she wished us to consider. To date, we have received no response. We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that defendant’s attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 109–110; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.) DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED LUI, J. We concur:

ROTHSCHILD, P. J.

JOHNSON, J.

Cites, in this corpus