gno.law

United States v. Javier Figueroa-Constantino

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 15-50162 · 2016-04-18 · Unpublished

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier FIGUEROA-CONSTANTINO, A.K.A. Javier Constantino Figueroa, A.K.A. Javier Constantino-Figueroa, A.K.A. Efren Figueroa Zamora, Defendant-Appellant

Area
other
Panel
Joseph J. Farris (author), Jay S. Bybee, Richard C. Tallman

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 18 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-50162 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:15-cr-07036-BTM v. MEMORANDUM* JAVIER FIGUEROA-CONSTANTINO, a.k.a. Javier Constantino Figueroa, a.k.a. Javier Constantino-Figueroa, a.k.a. Efren Figueroa Zamora, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry Ted Moskowitz, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted April 13, 2016** Before: FARRIS, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Javier Figueroa-Constantino appeals from the revocation of supervised release and six-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Figueroa-Constantino’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Figueroa-Constantino the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 15-50162