gno.law

People v. Ceballos CA2/6

California Court of Appeal · B265976 · 2016-04-11 · Unpublished

Area
criminal
Panel
Arthur Gilbert (author), Kenneth R. Yegan, Steven Z. Perren

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Filed 4/11/16 P. v. Ceballos CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B265976 (Super. Ct. No. 2014036131) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County)

v.

SAUL RAUL CEBALLOS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Saul Raul Ceballos pled guilty to burglary of an automobile. (Pen. Code, § 459.) He also admitted that he had suffered two prior Nevada convictions that constitute "strikes" within the meaning of the Three Strikes law. (§§ 667, 1170.12.) He moved to have the strikes stricken pursuant to People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal. 4th 497. At sentencing the trial court struck one of the strikes. It sentenced Ceballos to the two year middle term, doubled to four years because of the remaining strike. The court imposed a $300 restitution fine and $1,000 restitution. We appointed counsel to represent Ceballos in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no issues. On November 3, 2015, we advised Ceballos by mail that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished to raise on appeal. We received no reply. We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied Ceballos' attorney has fully complied with his responsibility, and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.) The judgment is affirmed. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

GILBERT, P. J.

We concur:

YEGAN, J.

PERREN, J.

2. Patricia M. Murphy, Judge Superior Court County of Ventura ______________________________ Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent

3.

Cites, in this corpus