United States v. Salvador Sanchez Miranda
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Trial judge
- Anthony J. Battaglia (district judge)
- Outcome
- dismissed — DISMISSED.
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 25 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-50225 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-07000-AJB v. MEMORANDUM* SALVADOR DE JESUS SANCHEZ MIRANDA, a.k.a. Salvador Jesus Sanchez, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 20, 2016** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Salvador De Jesus Sanchez Miranda appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the time-served sentence imposed upon revocation.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sanchez Miranda’s counsel * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
Because Sanchez Miranda has fully served his sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised released, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2 15-50225