Maeda-Garcia v. Loretta E. Lynch
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 20 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROMILO MAEDA-GARCIA; No. 07-75039 WILFREDO MAEDA, Agency Nos. A077-381-966 Petitioners, A076-865-591 A076-865-592 v. A076-865-593 LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.
Before: SCHROEDER and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges and BENITEZ,* District Judge.
The memorandum disposition filed on September 17, 2015 is amended as follows:
Replace the submission text on memorandum disposition page 1, lines 23- 24:
Argued and Submitted August 4, 2011** Seattle, Washington * The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. With:
Submitted August 4, 2011** Seattle, Washington Submission Vacated and Deferred August 2, 2011 Resubmitted September 15, 2015 The petition for panel rehearing is otherwise denied. Further petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc shall not be entertained.