United States v. Roberto Hernandez-Hernandez
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant
- Area
- other
- Panel
- Susan Graber (author), Richard A. Paez, Kim M. Wardlaw
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 20 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50473 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:12-cr-00847-LAB-1 v. MEMORANDUM * ROBERTO HERNANDEZ- HERNANDEZ, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted August 1, 2013 Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Roberto Hernandez-Hernandez appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 55-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Hernandez’s 55- month sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The above-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See id.
AFFIRMED.
2 12-50473