Mota v. Mukasey
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CONSTANTINA RAMIREZ MOTA, Petitioner, No. 07-71880 v. Agency No. A79-540-706 MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, ORDER Respondent. Filed December 8, 2008 Before: David R. Thompson and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge.*
ORDER
The parties having advised this court that they have exhausted attempts to settle this case, and the court’s Circuit Mediator having advised the court that mediation proceedings have terminated, and the parties having requested that the mandate now issue, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the mandate in this case shall issue forthwith.
*The Honorable Barry T. Moskowitz, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
16065 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.