E. Glasgow v. Michael Astrue
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 11 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS E. JOYCE GLASGOW, No. 08-35943 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00410-CRD Western District of Washington, v. Seattle MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER Defendant - Appellee.
Before: GOULD and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and BENITEZ, * District Judge.
The memorandum disposition filed on December 29, 2009, is amended as follows: On page 3, line 14, replace <examiner> with <expert, Dr. McKnight>.
On page 3, line 18, replace <examiner’s> with <expert’s>.
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and the * The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be entertained.