Omni Home Financing, Inc. v. Hartford Life and Annuity Insu
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS OMNI HOME FINANCING, INC., A No. 08-56431 California Corporation; KEITH W. MURPHY, An Individual; ANTHONY A. D.C. No. 3:06-cv-00921-IEG-JMA GAGLIONE, An Individual; DAVID A. Southern District of California, BANCROFT, An Individual; OMNI San Diego HOME FINANCING, INC. 412(I) DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN, An Employee Benefits Plan Under ERISA, ORDER Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, A Delaware Corporation; PAUL BANNOCK, An Individual, Defendants - Appellees.
Before: THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and BEISTLINE, * Chief District Judge.
Pursuant to stipulation by the parties, and for good cause shown, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their respective costs and * The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. attorneys’ fees. A certified copy of this order sent to the district court shall constitute the mandate.