Idrisa Sesay v. Michael Chertoff
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Trial judge
- Jeffrey T. Miller (district judge)
- Outcome
- dismissed — appeal is dismissed as moot.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 04 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IDRISA SESAY, No. 08-56812 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-02354-JM-LSP v. JANET NAPOLITANO,* Secretary of the ORDER Department of Homeland Security; ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General of the United States; ROBIN BAKER, Director of San Diego Field Office, U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement; JOHN A. GARZON, Officer-in-Charge, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jeffrey T. Miller, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted August 5, 2009 Pasadena, California Before: CANBY, WARDLAW and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The government’s motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground of mootness is GRANTED. See Clark v. Martinez, 543 U.S. 371, 376 n.3 (2005) Rodriguez v. * Janet Napolitano is substituted for her predecessor Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). Hayes, 578 F.3d 1032, 1044 (9th Cir. 2009); Picrin-Peron v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773, 776 (9th Cir. 1991). This appeal is dismissed as moot.
Because this mootness was caused by the unilateral act of the government, we vacate the decision of the district court and remand with instructions to dismiss the petition as moot. See U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, 513 U.S. 18, 25 (1994) (stating that equitable considerations favor vacatur “when mootness results from unilateral action of the party who prevailed below”); see also Alvarez v. Smith, ___ U.S. ___, 2009 WL 4573274, at *5-7 (U.S. Dec. 8, 2009).
APPEAL DISMISSED; REMANDED with instructions.