gno.law

Kevin Vanginderen v. Cornell University

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 08-56020 · 2009-12-10 · Unpublished

Proceeding
appeal
Trial court
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Trial judge
Barry T. Moskowitz (district judge)
Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 10 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN VANGINDEREN,

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 08-56020 v. D.C. No. 3:07-cv-02045-BTM- CORNELL UNIVERSITY, JMA Defendant - Appellee.

KEVIN VANGINDEREN,

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 09-55053 v. D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00736-BTM- JMA CORNELL UNIVERSITY; BERT DEIXLER, MEMORANDUM * Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 TH C IR. R. 36-3. Argued and Submitted November 6, 2009 Pasadena, California Before: BRIGHT, ** BYBEE, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

In this appeal, Kevin Vanginderen claims errors of law, fact, and in the admission of evidence. We have carefully examined these claims of error and determine that the rulings of the district court did not prejudice Vanginderen.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM. No costs are allowed on appeal.

** The Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

-2-