United States v. Ivan Sanabria-Archiga
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan SANABRIA-ARCHIGA, Defendant-Appellant
- Area
- other
- Panel
- William T. Wallace (author), Jay S. Bybee, Edward Leavy
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 12 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-50020 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:13-cr-01041-BTM v. MEMORANDUM* IVAN SANABRIA-ARCHIGA, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted December 9, 2014** Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Ivan Sanabria-Archiga appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We dismiss.
Because the government has properly objected to the timeliness of Sanabria- * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Archiga’s notice of appeal, which was filed over two months after the entry of judgment, we dismiss this appeal as untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i);
United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 942 (9th Cir. 2007).
DISMISSED.
2 14-50020