United States v. Miguel Menchaca-Hernandez
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel MENCHACA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant
- Area
- other
- Panel
- Mary M. Schroeder (author), Harry Pregerson, Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOV 25 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-55617 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:14-cv-00067-AJB 3:12-cr-02268-AJB v. MIGUEL MENCHACA-HERNANDEZ, MEMORANDUM* Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 21, 2014** Pasadena, California Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Miguel Menchaca-Hernandez challenges only the length of sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Because Menchaca-Hernandez has been released * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). from custody and is not subject to an additional term of supervised release, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See United States v. Verdin, 243 F.3d 1174, 1178 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).
DISMISSED.