John Earl Alford v. United States
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
375 F.2d 773 John Earl ALFORD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 21196.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
April 5, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Fred Kunzel, Judge.
Martin F. Bloom, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U. S. Atty., Phillip W. Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and HALBERT, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1 This appeal, based solely on the alleged insufficiency of the evidence, is completely without merit. It approaches the frivolous.
2 We affirm.