United States v. Torrio Sanders
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Torrio SANDERS, Defendant-Appellee
- Area
- other
- Panel
- Mary M. Schroeder (author), Fletcher, Gonzalo P. Curiel
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 18 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10434 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 4:12-cr-00042-CW-1 v. MEMORANDUM* TORRIO SANDERS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Claudia Wilken, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted September 12, 2014 San Francisco, California Before: SCHROEDER and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and CURIEL, District Judge.** The government appeals from the dismissal of an indictment charging Appellee Torrio Sanders as a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). After an extended colloquy with counsel that traced the history of the matter, the district court found there had been a constitutional violation. Under the appropriate legal standard, the court made the requisite findings. There was no clear error.
The appellee’s motion to expand record and/or request for judicial notice is denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.