United States v. Jorge Wernick-Chozet
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge Alejandro WERNICK-CHOZET, Defendant-Appellant
- Area
- other
- Panel
- Harry Pregerson (author), Stephen R. Reinhardt, Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 14 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-50109 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:11-cr-05735-H-1 v. ORDER* JORGE ALEJANDRO WERNICK- CHOZET, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 13, 2014 Pasadena, California Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
The joint motion for summary reversal is GRANTED. The mediation conference scheduled for August 27, 2014, is VACATED. Wernick-Chozet’s conviction is REVERSED, his sentence is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the district court.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. We commend the parties for their prompt and professional response to the court’s mediation order. Each side shall bear its own costs on appeal. A copy of this order shall constitute the mandate of this court.