gno.law

P. v.Guerrero CA2/6

California Court of Appeal · B252757 · 2014-07-14 · Unpublished

Area
criminal
Panel
Kenneth R. Yegan (author), Arthur Gilbert, Steven Z. Perren

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Filed 7/14/14 P. v.Guerrero CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.111.5.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B252757 (Super. Ct. No. 2012034560) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County)

v.

MICHAEL JASON GUERRERO,

Defendant and Appellant.

Michael Jason Guerrero appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of sale/transportation/offer to sell a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a).) The trial court sentenced appellant to three years state prison plus eight months for violating probation in an unrelated case (Case No. 2009047390). Appellant was ordered to pay a $200 restitution fine (Pen. Code, § 1202.4, subd. (b)), a $200 parole revocation fine (Pen. Code, § 1202.45) a $200 crime lab fee (Health & Saf. Code, § 11372.5, subd. (a)) and a $600 drug program fee (Health & Saf. Code, § 11372.7, subd. (a)). We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel’s examination of the record, she filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. On May 1, 2014, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. No response has been received. We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.) The judgment is affirmed. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P.J.

PERREN, J.

2 Patricia M. Murphy, Judge Superior Court County of Ventura ______________________________ Patricia A. Malone, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

Cites, in this corpus