United States v. Joaquin Hernandez-Navarro
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Trial judge
- M. James Lorenz (district judge)
- Outcome
- dismissed — DISMISSED.
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 11 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-50564 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-04015-L v. MEMORANDUM* JOAQUIN HERNANDEZ-NAVARRO, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 7, 2014** Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Joaquin Hernandez-Navarro appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 8-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hernandez-Navarro’s counsel has filed a brief * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
Because Hernandez-Navarro has fully served his custodial sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised released, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2 13-50564