People v. Marshall
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Chin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
114 Cal.Rptr.2d 227 (2001) 35 P.3d 416 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Phillip Cameron MARSHALL, Defendant and Appellant.
No. S091666. Supreme Court of California.
November 28, 2001. Pursuant to rule 29.4(c), California Rules of Court, the above-entitled review is DISMISSED and cause is remanded to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Five.
CHIN, J., was absent and did not participate.
GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, J., BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., BROWN, J., and MORENO, J., concur.
Cites, in this corpus
- Humphrey v. APPELLATE DIVISION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT S101047 · 2001-11-28
Cited by
- Humphrey v. APPELLATE DIVISION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT S101047 · 2001-11-28