Laub v. Davis
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- George (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
40 Cal.Rptr.3d 117 (2006) 129 P.3d 320 LAUB v. DAVIS.
Regional Council of Rural Counties v. State.
No. S138975, S138974. Supreme Court of California.
January 25, 2006. Petition for review granted.
GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, MORENO, CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.
CHIN, J., was absent and did not participate.
Cites, in this corpus
- City of Stockton v. SC S139237 · 2006-02-01
Cited by
- City of Stockton v. SC S139237 · 2006-02-01