Panther v. Park
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- George (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
130 Cal.Rptr.2d 656 (2003) 63 P.3d 215 James PANTHER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. William K. PARK et al., Defendants and Respondents.
and related actions No. S110025. Supreme Court of California, En Banc.
January 15, 2003. The above-entitled review is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, with directions to vacate its decision and the dismiss the petition for writ of mandate pursuant to written request of counsel for petitioner below.
GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ, concur.
Cites, in this corpus
- Salazar v. DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED S111876 · 2003-01-22
Cited by
- Salazar v. DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT INCORPORATED S111876 · 2003-01-22