Musaelian v. Adams
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- George (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
67 Cal.Rptr.3d 460 (2007) 169 P.3d 882 MUSAELIAN v. ADAMS.
No. S156045. Supreme Court of California.
October 10, 2007. Prior report: Cal.App., 63 Cal.Rptr.3d 603.
The petition for review is granted.
The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Whether an attorney who is appearing in propria persona is entitled to attorney fees as a sanction under Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7.
GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, MORENO and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Nguyen S154847 · 2007-10-10
- In Re Jasmine S. B194714 · 2007-07-25
Cited by
- People v. Nguyen S154847 · 2007-10-10