People v. Lincoln
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- George (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
67 Cal.Rptr.3d 172 (2007) 169 P.3d 96 PEOPLE v. LINCOLN.
No. S148990. Supreme Court of California.
September 12, 2007. Each of the above-entitled matters is transferred to the originating Court of Appeal with directions to vacate its decision and reconsider the cause in light of People v. Black (2007) 41 Cal.4th 799, 62 Cal. Rptr.3d 569, 161 P.3d 1130 and People v. *173 Sandoval (2007) 41 Cal.4th 825, 62 Cal. Rptr.3d 588, 161 P.3d 1146. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d).)
GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, MORENO and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Sandoval S148917 · 2007-07-19
- People v. Black S126182 · 2007-07-19