People v. Allen
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- George (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
7 Cal.Rptr.3d 778 (2003) 81 P.3d 222 PEOPLE v. ALLEN.
No. S110035. Supreme Court of California.
December 23, 2003. Violet M. Lee, DAG, Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Thomas M. Singman, Attorney at Law, Oakland, CA, for Defendant and Appellant.
Transferred to Court of Appeal, Third District, for reconsideration in light of People v. Reynoso (2003) 31 Cal.4th 903, 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 769, 74 P.3d 852.
GEORGE, C.J., BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.
Cites, in this corpus
- Kadish v. JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS S120631 · 2003-12-23
- People v. Reynoso S103343, S103340 · 2003-08-25
Cited by
- Kadish v. JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS S120631 · 2003-12-23