People v. Fryman
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- George (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
4 Cal.Rptr.3d 702 (2003) 76 P.3d 363 PEOPLE v. FRYMAN.
No. S107283. Supreme Court of California.
September 10, 2003. Morris Lenk, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for the People.
Marylou Hillberg, Attorney at Law, Sebastopol, CA, for Tommy Lee Fryman.
Transferred to Court of Appeal, Sixth District, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of People v. Floyd (2003) 1 Cal.Rptr.3d 885, 72 P.3d 820.
GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN and MORENO, JJ, concur. BROWN, J., is of the opinion the matter should be retained.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Floyd S105225 · 2003-07-21