Cummins, Inc. v. SC
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- George (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
4 Cal.Rptr.3d 703 (2003) 76 P.3d 364 CUMMINS, INC.
v. S.C. (COX).
No. S117726. Supreme Court of California.
September 10, 2003. Tami S. Smason, Leila Nourani, Foley & Lardner, Los Angeles, CA, for Cummins, Inc.
Lawrence J. Hutchens, Attorney at Law, Michael Scott Humphries, Law Offices of Lawrence J. Hutchens, Bellflower, CA, for Edward D. Cox and Sandi R. Cox.
Patrick James Wehage, Thomas M. Murphy, Sutton & Murphy, Mission Viego, CA, for Winnebago Industries, Inc.
Martin William Anderson, Attorney at Law, Santa Ana, CA, for Anderson Law Firm.
Keith A. Dawson, Dawson & Dawson, Corona Del Mar, CA, for Monaco Coach Corporation.
Petition for review granted.
GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ., concur.