People v. Williams
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- George (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
14 Cal.Rptr.3d 211 (2004) 91 P.3d 163 PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS.
No. S123910. Supreme Court of California.
June 9, 2004. Review granted/briefing deferred (rule 29.1).
Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in People v. Howard, 125 Cal.Rptr.2d 442, 54 P.3d 262 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 28.2(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California *212 Rules of Court, rule 29.1, is deferred pending further order of the court.
GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ., concur.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Howard S108353 · 2002-09-11