Harry Morris Sherman v. United States
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
220 F.2d 281 Harry Morris SHERMAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Misc. No. 422.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 16, 1955.
Harry Morris Sherman, Steilacoom, Wash., for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1 Movant has been convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, of narcotics violation.
2 He seeks from this court permission to appeal from his judgment of conviction and permission to prosecute his appeal in forma pauperis. It appears from the records in this case that movant's notice of appeal was filed in the District Court on January 24, 1954. The trial court has certified that the appeal is not taken in good faith and permission to prosecute the appeal forma pauperis is denied. 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
Cites, in this corpus
- Sherman v. United States Misc. No. 422 · 1955-03-16