gno.law

Augustin Valdez, Jr. v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., as Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 13860 · 1954-11-12 · Published

Proceeding
appeal
Trial court
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

216 F.2d 616 Augustin VALDEZ, Jr., Appellant, v. Herbert BROWNELL, Jr., as Attorney General of the United States,* Appellee.

No. 13860.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 3, 1953.

Nov. 12, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; William M. Byrne, Judge.

Philip Newman, Newman & Newman, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Cecil Hicks, Clyde C. Downing, Robert K. Grean, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and WIIG, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1 On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, Valdez v. McGranery, D.C.S.D.Cal., 114 F.Supp. 173, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

* Attorney General Brownell was substituted for Attorney General McGranery on

Cites, in this corpus