United States v. Odilion Salgado-Castaneda

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 10-50590 · 2011-08-17 · Unpublished

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Odilion SALGADO-CASTANEDA, A.K.A. Odilon Salgado-Castaneda, Defendant-Appellant

Proceeding: appeal
Trial court: United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Trial judge: M. James Lorenz (district judge)
Outcome: dismissed — DISMISSED.
Area: criminal
Panel: Thomas (author), Barry G. Silverman, Richard R. Clifton

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 17 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50590 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-00026-L v. MEMORANDUM * ODILION SALGADO-CASTANEDA, a.k.a. Odilon Salgado-Castaneda, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 11, 2011 ** Before: THOMAS, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Odilion Salgado-Castaneda appeals from the eight-month sentence imposed upon the revocation of supervised release.

Salgado-Castaneda has completed his custodial sentence and no additional * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). term of supervision was imposed. This court ordered appellant to move for voluntary dismissal, or show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. To date, counsel has not responded. Accordingly, Salgado- Castaneda’s appeal from the sentence is dismissed as moot. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).

DISMISSED.

2 10-50590