Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Eddleman

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 13531 · 1942-03-25 · Published · 50 Cal. App. 2d 857 · 123 P.2d 874

Area: civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

50 Cal.App.2d 857 (1942) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (a Corporation), Respondent, v. MOSES E. EDDLEMAN, Appellant.

Civ. No. 13531. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Mar. 25, 1942. Houston A. Snidow for Appellant.

Sanner, Fleming & Irwin for Respondent.

Memorandum THE COURT.

The respondent having filed its motion to dismiss the appeal in the above entitled matter, supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court setting forth the facts required by rule VI of this court, and it appearing that all of the grounds stated in the motion are supported by the said certificate and by the authorities cited, it is hereby ordered that this appeal be, and it is hereby dismissed.

Cites, in this corpus

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Eddleman Civ. No. 13531 · 1942-03-25